Free Consultation
To discuss your financial situation and learn more about your debt relief options, give us a call at (520) 745-4429 or (480) 788-0098.
Tucson(520) 745-4429
Mesa/Phoenix (480) 788-0098
If you are considering bankruptcy, you may wonder how the payments you make to certain creditors before bankruptcy might affect the bankruptcy. You may even wonder if you should be making payments to anyone before bankruptcy.
At Yusufov Law Firm PLLC, we assist debtors in Mesa, Phoenix, and Tucson who want clear guidance. Here, we explain how pre-bankruptcy payments to creditors are treated in bankruptcy, and how they might affect your case.
Preference payments refer to payments a debtor (i.e., the person filing for bankruptcy) makes to some creditors right before filing for bankruptcy. These payments may give certain creditors more money than others, bypassing the equal treatment that bankruptcy law aims to promote. In other words, by making these payments to a particular creditor, the debtor is “preferring” that creditor to his or her other creditors.” A bankruptcy trustee is allowed to recover these funds so that they can be divided among all creditors. The point of these rules is to keep things fair by preventing a debtor from giving select creditors a bigger slice of the pie.
A preference action is a lawsuit that the trustee brings against a creditor who received preference payments from the debtor. The purpose of a preference action is to recover the preference payments that the creditor received from the debtor. The debtor is not normally involved in a preference action.
Since the debtor is not involved in preference actions, the natural question is, why do they matter to the debtor? If you are considering bankruptcy, understanding preference actions can help you avoid costly financial mistakes. Many people considering bankruptcy want to pay off favored creditors before filing the bankruptcy. This could be a credit card that they would like to keep, a doctor that they like, or even a friend or family member. However, because of preference actions, these payments can be undone by the bankruptcy trustee. In other words, the person or company paid will not get the benefit of the payment. So, the debtor who makes the payment ends up spending money without getting any benefit from the payment, because the person or company being paid will not be able to keep the money that could have been used by the debtor on other necessary expenses.
Below are some guiding factors that courts typically rely on to determine if a payment to a creditor is a preference.
First, there must be a transfer of your property for the benefit of a creditor. This can include direct cash payments, checks, or property titles. Second, the transfer must be on account of a debt the creditor already holds, rather than a new debt incurred right at that moment. Third, you must have been insolvent at the time of the payment. Fourth, the payment usually must happen within 90 days before filing your bankruptcy petition (or up to one year if the creditor is an “insider”). Finally, that transfer should result in the creditor receiving more than if your debts were handled under a Chapter 7 liquidation scenario.
Insolvency means that your total debts exceed the value of your assets. Absent proof otherwise, bankruptcy law presumes that debtors are insolvent during the 90 days leading up to a case filing. This presumption can save time for trustees by making it easier to assert that a payment qualifies as a preference.
An insider might include a relative, a corporate officer, or a business partner who has a close relationship with you or your company. If a creditor is an insider, the trustee can typically seek to recover payments made to them within one year before filing. The logic is that debtors might be more inclined to pay family members or close associates first, so these transactions are scrutinized more closely.
In Arizona, state statutes regarding exemptions and property protections can factor into how the court views preference payments. While federal bankruptcy rules govern preference claims, Arizona law influences what property a debtor can protect from creditors. The existence of state-specific exemptions might help reduce risk if you face a possible preference claim.
If the trustee alleges that a payment meets the requirements of a preference, there are still possible defenses. These defenses often hinge on showing that the payment fits within regular business transactions or that new value was added after the payment occurred.
This defense greatly benefits individuals and businesses who can show that their payments were made under normal invoice and billing patterns, without special treatment. The following points often come into play when deciding whether the payment is considered part of normal activities:
If the payment was consistent with regular billing routines, the trustee may not be able to recover it as a preference.
Under this defense, a payment is not considered a preference if the debtor received new value (such as goods or services) at the same time the payment was made. Cash-on-delivery (C.O.D.) transactions are a classic example. The rationale is that the debtor’s estate is not diminished, as they received something of equivalent value in exchange for the payment, rather than simply paying down a pre-existing debt.
This defense applies when you make a payment, but then the creditor provides further goods or services after getting paid. If that creditor later supplies new value, it can offset part or all of the amount that qualifies as a preference. Here’s how it generally works:
You pay the creditor $1,000.
The creditor then delivers $800 worth of additional products before you file.
The trustee might only be able to seek recovery of $200, since new value offsets most of the payment’s impact.
Even if the recipient has spent the funds, the bankruptcy trustee can still demand repayment. The creditor will be legally obligated to return the money to the bankruptcy estate, potentially from other assets or by arranging a payment plan with the trustee.
Yes, for consumer bankruptcies, the trustee typically won’t pursue payments if the total amount paid to a single creditor is less than a certain threshold, which is currently $600. This rule prevents the trustee from spending time and resources chasing very small payments. This rule only applies to payments made to non-insiders (not friends or relatives).
Generally, no. As long as you are honest and disclose the payments to your attorney and the court, you won’t be penalized for making a preference payment. The law’s purpose is to ensure fairness among your creditors, not to punish you.
You should immediately inform your bankruptcy attorney about the payment in full detail. Do not attempt to hide the transaction or get the money back yourself, as this could create more significant problems for your bankruptcy case.
Not necessarily, but they are scrutinized far more closely over a longer period (one year instead of 90 days). If the payment can be successfully defended as being in the “ordinary course of business” or was an exchange for new value, it may not be recovered by the trustee. However, repaying a simple loan from a relative shortly before bankruptcy is almost always considered a preference.
If you’re concerned about a possible preference payment claim in Arizona, Yusufov Law Firm is here to help. We assist clients in Tucson, Mesa, and Phoenix with clear, practical guidance in line with federal bankruptcy law. Call us at (520) 745-4429 in Tucson or (480) 788-0098 in Mesa/Phoenix, or visit our Contact Us page to schedule a consultation. We’re ready to help you protect your interests and move forward with confidence.
To discuss your financial situation and learn more about your debt relief options, give us a call at (520) 745-4429 or (480) 788-0098.
© 2010-2025 Yusufov Law Firm PLLC. All Rights Reserved | Disclaimer | Sitemap |